<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s &#8220;open source knowledge management&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:41:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeergoGoroumB</title>
		<link>http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-190194</link>
		<dc:creator>BeergoGoroumB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/#comment-190194</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knowledge management</title>
		<link>http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-171675</link>
		<dc:creator>knowledge management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/#comment-171675</guid>
		<description>It was a very new thing related to KM.I was completely unaware of it.But the detailing about the open source knowledge management done in this post is very much informative.Reading it my knowledge about KM is enhanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a very new thing related to KM.I was completely unaware of it.But the detailing about the open source knowledge management done in this post is very much informative.Reading it my knowledge about KM is enhanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to a Stokes Template site</title>
		<link>http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-52393</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to a Stokes Template site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/#comment-52393</guid>
		<description>[...] Science Commons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s &#8220;open source knowledge management&amp;rd... - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Science Commons &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; What&rsquo;s &ldquo;open source knowledge management&#38;rd&#8230; &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Commons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s &#8220;cyberinfrastructure&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-51233</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Commons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What&#8217;s &#8220;cyberinfrastructure&#8221;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/#comment-51233</guid>
		<description>[...] first time out, we took on open source knowledge management. This time, we&#8217;re tackling [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first time out, we took on open source knowledge management. This time, we&#8217;re tackling [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rufus Pollock</title>
		<link>http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/comment-page-1/#comment-35137</link>
		<dc:creator>Rufus Pollock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sciencecommons.org/weblog/archives/2007/12/05/whats-open-source-knowledge-management/#comment-35137</guid>
		<description>I agree very much with the points being made here and share some substantial similarities with the views we put forward in an essay we published a little over a year and a half ago entitled &quot;The Four Principles of Open Knowledge Development&quot;:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.okfn.org/2006/05/09/the-four-principles-of-open-knowledge-development/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
http://blog.okfn.org/2006/05/09/the-four-principles-of-open-knowledge-development/&lt;/a&gt;

As we wrote there:

&quot;Open knowledge means porting much more of the open source stack than just the idea of open licensing. It is about porting many of the processes and tools that attach to the open development process — the process enabled by the use of an open approach to knowledge production and distribution.&quot;

The Four Principles

Open knowledge allows (and requires for its success) a development process that is:


Incremental
Decentralized (and asyncrhonous)
Collaborative
Componentized (and ‘packagized’)&quot;


Since then we&#039;ve been particularly focused on the last of these four items: &quot;Componentization&quot;. Componentization is the process of atomizing (breaking down) resources into separate reusable packages that can be easily recombined. As we wrote in the original post:

&quot;This probably the most important feature of (open) knowledge development as well as the one which is, at present, least advanced. If you look at the way software has evolved it now highly componentized into packages/libraries. Doing this allows one to ‘divide and conquer’ the organizational and conceptual problems of highly complex systems. Even more importantly it allows for greatly increased levels of reuse.

The power and significance of componentization really comes home to one when using a package manager (e.g. apt-get for debian) on a modern operating system. A request to install a single given package can result in the automatic discovery and installation of all packages on which that one depends. The result may be a list of tens — or even hundreds — of packages in a graphic demonstration of the way in which computer programs have been broken down into interdependent components.&quot;

Further detailed discussion of what componentization involves can be found in the follow-up post:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
http://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree very much with the points being made here and share some substantial similarities with the views we put forward in an essay we published a little over a year and a half ago entitled &#8220;The Four Principles of Open Knowledge Development&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.okfn.org/2006/05/09/the-four-principles-of-open-knowledge-development/" rel="nofollow"><br />
</a><a href="http://blog.okfn.org/2006/05/09/the-four-principles-of-open-knowledge-development/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.okfn.org/2006/05/09/the-four-principles-of-open-knowledge-development/</a></p>
<p>As we wrote there:</p>
<p>&#8220;Open knowledge means porting much more of the open source stack than just the idea of open licensing. It is about porting many of the processes and tools that attach to the open development process — the process enabled by the use of an open approach to knowledge production and distribution.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Four Principles</p>
<p>Open knowledge allows (and requires for its success) a development process that is:</p>
<p>Incremental<br />
Decentralized (and asyncrhonous)<br />
Collaborative<br />
Componentized (and ‘packagized’)&#8221;</p>
<p>Since then we&#8217;ve been particularly focused on the last of these four items: &#8220;Componentization&#8221;. Componentization is the process of atomizing (breaking down) resources into separate reusable packages that can be easily recombined. As we wrote in the original post:</p>
<p>&#8220;This probably the most important feature of (open) knowledge development as well as the one which is, at present, least advanced. If you look at the way software has evolved it now highly componentized into packages/libraries. Doing this allows one to ‘divide and conquer’ the organizational and conceptual problems of highly complex systems. Even more importantly it allows for greatly increased levels of reuse.</p>
<p>The power and significance of componentization really comes home to one when using a package manager (e.g. apt-get for debian) on a modern operating system. A request to install a single given package can result in the automatic discovery and installation of all packages on which that one depends. The result may be a list of tens — or even hundreds — of packages in a graphic demonstration of the way in which computer programs have been broken down into interdependent components.&#8221;</p>
<p>Further detailed discussion of what componentization involves can be found in the follow-up post:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/" rel="nofollow"><br />
</a><a href="http://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.okfn.org/2007/04/30/what-do-we-mean-by-componentization-for-knowledge/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

